Preliminary Injunction in Trademark Law

A preliminary injunction can provide fast interim relief in a trademark dispute, but urgency, evidence, proportionality and procedural risk must be assessed carefully.

Back to Trademark Law.

When interim relief may be relevant

Interim proceedings are designed for situations in which waiting for ordinary proceedings could undermine effective protection. The applicant must establish both the substantive claim and the procedural requirements for urgent relief.

Preparing the application

The right, infringing use, evidence, chronology and requested prohibition should be presented precisely. Overbroad wording can create enforcement and cost risks.

Defending an injunction

A respondent should review service, scope, available procedural remedies, evidence and whether to comply, challenge or seek a negotiated resolution. Deadlines can be short.

Preparing a trademark-law review

For an efficient first assessment, it is useful to provide the relevant registration extracts or application numbers, the sign as actually used, the goods or services concerned, key correspondence and a short chronology. In infringement matters, screenshots, packaging, invoices or marketplace listings can help establish how and when the sign was used. In filing matters, planned markets and the intended goods and services are particularly important.

Urgency is assessed case by case and can be affected by delay. Immediate legal review is advisable in live injunction proceedings.