Counterfeit Purchase: Recovering the Price

If goods sold as genuine later appear to be counterfeit, the buyer should preserve the listing, authenticity statements, payment records, product and communications before seeking recovery of the purchase price.

Back to Civil Law.

Contractual description and authenticity

Whether the goods are defective depends on what was agreed and objectively expected. An explicit representation that an item is genuine can be central to the assessment.

Return and repayment

The correct route may involve subsequent performance, withdrawal or other remedies depending on the facts. The seller’s identity, platform process and payment method can also affect practical recovery.

Evidence of counterfeit status

Expert statements, serial-number checks, manufacturer correspondence or other reliable evidence may be needed. The buyer should avoid destroying evidence before the dispute is resolved.

Preparing a civil-law review

A focused civil-law review is easier when the contract, order documents, invoices, payment evidence, notices, correspondence and a short chronology are available. Photographs, product listings or other evidence should be preserved where quality, authenticity or performance is disputed. For monetary claims, due dates and previous demands for payment are also relevant.

Counterfeit purchases can also involve intellectual-property issues, but the buyer’s repayment claim should be analysed from the purchase contract and evidence.